Geospatial information has always been central to the workflows of urban planning, landscape architecture, architecture, and engineering projects. Typically, these kinds of projects begin with geodata collection, including: gathering drawings, field data collection, digitization of analog data, collecting available digital data, and creating maps. In the digital era, using spatial data typically involves using GIS software to organize, manage, and derive information. Regardless of whether the project is the scale of a long-term city plan or a detailed design for a green stormwater infrastructure project, geodata collection builds an information foundation to support decision-making.
Achieving an innovative and optimum design in these kinds of projects is an iterative process that involves feedback from stakeholders. Using geospatial data and mapping to support the design process undoubtedly makes the outreach and feedback processes more effective. The maps provide the medium for discussions of quantitative and qualitative aspects of a project.
The major challenge with using spatial data in a design workflow is often identified in the technical logistics of the process. Out-of-the-box GIS software generally aren’t directly configured to support an iterative design workflow or answer the kinds of questions these processes need to answer, and using geodata and GIS-based analysis tools within the iterative, exploratory, creative nature of the design process has a tendency to be viewed as slowing down internal and external feedback loops.
Thought not a new idea, supporting the design process with digital spatial data and geospatial analysis tools has in recent years been called “GeoDesign”. This buzzword has a number of evolving definitions, interpretations, and critiques. Stephen Ervin, of the Harvard GSD, succinctly described GeoDesign as “a design and planning method which tightly couples the creation of design proposals with impact simulation informed by geographic contexts, systems thinking, and digital technologies” during the 2012 Esri GeoDesign Summit. The key sentiment is the tight coupling of technology and process, which suggests an evolution of software to directly support iterative design workflows with feedback mechanisms.
GIS software and computing capabilities continue to evolve since that 2012 summit and design professions continue to rely on geodata. As a result, more software tools to directly support the design process are becoming available.
That said, a critical and fundamental issue remains in these projects: the quality, vintage, and management of these data at the foundation of the process. The evolution of the software tools is for naught if the quality, portability, and maintenance life cycle of the underlying data remain unresolved. These things can pose serious challenges to organizations that want to take their design processes and outreach to the next level.
CivicMapper is familiar with each of these challenges and has experience helping organizations address them in planning, design, and engineering projects. Almost every organization that we’ve worked with builds upon data of unknown quality. Our philosophy is to start by thinking about data as a living product, not just as a deliverable, and build from there.
This approach includes:
In this manner, we help organizations take what they have and intelligently build strong, resilient, and reliable data stores upon which we can help implement sustainable business processes that support better planning and design workflows.
This post originally appeared on LinkedIn
CivicMapper provides modern geospatial technology solutions for solving problems in the natural and built environments. Get in touch via email@example.com.